A clash of philosophies seymour glass

Why did the fire at Grenfell Tower spread so quickly? With our college paper writing service, you are sure to get the custom papers. It means that every part of the nettie the colorpaper will be written with the grendel, consideration of your instructions and cross's nigrescence model specifications.

A clash of philosophies seymour glass

Treat well those who are good, Also treat well those who are not good; thus is goodness attained. The sage is self-effacing in his dealings with all under heaven, and bemuddles his mind for the sake of all under heaven.

The common people all rivet their eyes and ears upon him, and the sage makes them all chuckle like children. Lao Tzu1 The above excerpt serves as a simple characterization of the Taoist saint: By acting in such an unimposing fashion, the Taoist saint is able to see the heart of the situation lucidly and pacify the situation with greater ease.

By dissolving his misleading ego, a saint is able to live in deep understanding of the Tao, and indiscriminately love all of existence with enough virtue and patience to serve as an example of goodness for mankind. The Parting of the Way, Welch, p.

A Biography, Alexander, p. Taoism seeks to coincide with the natural patterns of person and nature; Holden however is consistently disenchanted with and contrary towards the dispositions of he various characters throughout the novel. Inspired by the example of her saintliness, Holden gains the mere recognition of the path to happiness but not the strength to walk it.

An Introduction, Salinger, p. His ambivalence reflects the vain search for spiritual contentment in a phony and disappointing world; he is hence stuck in a limbo of confused compassion for mankind.

A clash of philosophies seymour glass

Holden is unable to express any sort of compassion for D. He is only certain that he misses13 the numerous characters throughout the book.

A clash of philosophies seymour glass

This disrupts the harmony that is existence and the way of the Tao decrees that saints must be able to create inner peace by creating outer peace; thus in disturbing the harmony of existence they disturb 9 p.

Holden somewhat forgives characters like Stradlater and Maurice for their misgivings towards him, but he cannot forget the betrayal of people he trusted like Mr.

Because of such disillusionments, Holden advises the reader to beware of trusting society and embracing it with indiscriminate trust. However, the Taoist professes that the distrust of the listener makes the speaker a liar, not the act an act of lying.

Holden cannot appreciate spiritual achievement yet because he is too resentful, too blinded by his loss of innocence to attempt harmony with the society and thus harmony with the Tao.

This renders him incapable of serving as a model of virtue and spiritual strength. It is clear that by the completion of The Catcher in the Rye, Holden has not achieved the spiritual accomplishment of sainthood; he is too shallow to love humanity, to immature to serve as a model of virtue to mankind and too egotistical to consider the individual outside of his own frame of conscience.

Holden is incapable of seeing people objectively, and for that reason he cannot logically love them without the potential of his own inherent indiscrimination. Interestingly enough, Holden is a character that Salinger does not reuse like he does with Seymour and other Glass family characters.

Salinger was young in both life and 17 Baumbach, p. However, with the characters of Teddy and Seymour, the responsibility of their failed sanctification lies exactly with this suffocating, relentlessly intrusive society and not with inherent flaws of their own characters.

Seymour has attained what can at least be recognized as an impressive measure of sainthood; well-versed in Eastern and Western philosophies, Seymour can be accurately connected to the Taoist train of thought because Taoism is referenced most often in stories concerning him and other Glass family characters.

The intentions of his actions seem obscure sometimes because the acts themselves seem nonexistent. By conducting himself in such a self-effacing manner, Seymour manages to convey his criticisms without conflict to the receiver because he simply poses- not forces- his opinion.

Salinger, like Seymour, was in constant conflict with society, but unlike Seymour, or Teddy, was unable to emotionally transcend it without withdrawing into seclusion. Seymour, though, tries to live in the world because he seeks to establish harmony with society just as he has established harmony with the Tao.Book results of title by Song Of The Wolf Sanctuary.

A clash of philosophies: Seymour Glass vs The Misfit Two books written by J.D. Salinger, known for his “Catcher in the Rye”, proposes two alternative thinking towards the defiance against society and its current state of “accepted” reality.

It can be noted that Sybil Carpenter is the only one who is able to "see more" in Seymour Glass.

Seymour's distinct issues should be apparent to the everyday world; however, it takes the eyes and understanding of a child to show the readers who Seymour actually is.

A Clash Between German and Japanese Battleships Would Have August 13th, - A Clash Between German and Japanese Battleships Would Have Been Mighty As the clouds of .

A clash of philosophies: Seymour Glass vs The Misfit Two books written by J.D. Salinger, known for his “Catcher in the Rye”, proposes two alternative thinking towards the defiance against society and its current state of “accepted” reality.

Nov 26,  · Misty Dixon Mrs. Caldwell Comp II 16 September Arnold Friend the Devil Arnold Friend portrays the devil in many ways In the story, Where are You Going, Where Have You Been by: Joyce Carol Oates Arnold friend is the devil, he went to Connie’s house and tries to get her to go for a ride with him and his friend Elli Oscar so, he can rape and kill her.

Taoism in Sartre | Sara Kallock - kaja-net.com